jup and since zeitgeist sucks why is this even in the top 50 documentaries

wrote:I'm not a fan of Zeitgeist at all but I used that as it seemed to be the clearest example of one being excluded despite it's rating.

I think this actually has something to do with the elusive "regular votes" on IMDb...

wrote:Also, it's a pity when something like American Zeitgeist which has clearly been mistakenly voted on keeps getting in the top 50 (and is still being checked by people).

On this point, I totally agree. I think there is always a proclivity for certain films to get mixed up by IMDb voters. But I think it's unfortunate that such a vast number of Zeitgest fans are so collectively retarded as to consistently confuse this film with Peter Joseph effort. After all, it only takes a few seconds of double-checking to vote for the correct feature...

ugh, it looks like I messed up my "quotes"... I guess that makes me look somewhat retarded lol. But, at least on IMDb you delete your mistakes once you've realized your error (and vote for the right film, for instance), whereas here on iCM there is no such capacity for correction.